The lawyer says a computer ban in the anti -war case gave the government an unjust advantage.

Electronics in the detention area is severely prohibited, but Ahmad had registered the documentation last night to ensure that, as Khalil’s legal representative, allowing his laptop to enter the court in accordance with EOIR. However, Ahmad said in a sworn statement that a few minutes before the proceedings began, he was informed by the detention staff that he was banned from bringing his devices inside, according to Kumin’s instructions, and forced him to return his laptop to the college and enter the country. After the proceedings began, Khalil says he was sitting in front of the three security lawyers with each of his laptops.

Ahmed says Hollywood’s image of lawyers is more old -fashioned by banking funds. “You effectively use technology that you need to be able to answer in real -time, or ask in real time, or show your customer in real -time, what evidence may the government speak or answer,” he says. “This is always very important because you want to make sure that any representation made by the other party is real.”

Michelle Mendes, a lawyer for the National Immigration Project, says the asymmetry of access to technology and resources between government and non -citizens in the court is a reflection of who controls.

“As long as the immigration courts are in charge of the executive branch, the non -citizens will never intend to receive a fair petition,” he says.

Menondz points out that since February 2022, the Ministry of Justice has required all immigration lawyers to register the courts electronically, effectively setting the expectation that lawyers must rely on digital access to court cases, citing cases and other matters, rather than risky risks.

“The personal image of the box is definitely in the right situation,” he says. “The worst scenario is that such a lawyer could not submit the court to the court as the court will ask. They don’t.”

According to Ahmad, both the head of the ice center, Shadow Rice and Judge Khalil, rejected the ban, which Ahmad says he had received his remarks just minutes before the hearing began. “When I asked me why, I was told that it was a immigration judge who has made the determination,” he says. He says he wanted to talk to a private judge before the hearing, but his request was rejected.

Ahmed says Kumin finally informed him that the electronic ban was at the request of the ice facilities. But when Ahmed could consult with the supervisor, who was also in the room at the time, the request was rejected. “Especially for Mr. Khalil, it seemed unfair,” he said, “As he looked at the homeland’s security lawyers who had three laptops at his desk. “Government lawyers were doing Google searches, writing emails and reading articles while making a hearing,” he adds.