Republicans were divided into the Stopgap strategy

Republicans are divided while trying to draw a plan to keep the government open after the end of the month, with 12 legislative days until the financing is running out.

Senior Republican allocations are paid to correct short -term financing that will continue until November to purchase a time for Congress to conclude a larger deal than the two parties to finance the government until the early fall of 2026.

But some of the eager conservatives, who are sought by the possibility of their exposure through the huge end of the year, hoping to avoid negotiating with Democrats on spending increases, were making a continuous decision for the entire year (CR).

Regardless of the strategic spokesman Mike Johnson (R-La), the majority leader of the Senate John Thun (RS. But it also has traces of Johnson’s control over the majority of the heavy Republican Party.

“This is what I think: Let’s do CR for one year if we will do that, and make it flat, so that there is already the reduction associated with inflation,” said MP Scott Perry (R-PA), former head of the Various Trial of Freedom. “I am not interested in anything that makes us directly before holidays, because we all know exactly how it will happen.”

Many Republicans have said that the White House is looking forward to the Stopgap Fund in the 2026 calendar year, giving a boost to the militant people who say that Congress should pay CR in the long run.

“We know that the White House wants this to next year, and if we will put in the next year, I only say and put it next December,” said Andy Harris, one of the elderly.

However, other Republican allocations want to see the process of determining new financing levels. The government closes at the end of what is basically a continuous decision throughout the full year, most of them work at the financial levels approved under the Biden Administration-where leaders argue during the recent financing tragedy in March that they need more time to know the levels of financing in line with President Trump’s priorities.

Tom Cole, head of the home allocations, told reporters that he hoped to put Johnson in a state of stopping until the end of November. He pointed to the optimism that he and the Chair of the Senate Credit Susan Collins can negotiate an agreement to approve many public financing bills for the year 2026, which begins on October 1, and the use of Attopgap to cover the rest when negotiating other financing levels with Democrats.

“Let’s move something. Let’s get CR shorter time and then try to continue to move and try to run a larger discussion on the upper line,” Cole said, adding to negotiations with Democrats: “We are not as far as it seems that most people think we are.”

Johnson refused to be distributed in a schedule when he was asked about Cole’s goal in November, but he indicated that he was open to negotiating with the Democrats due to funding.

Johnson said at a press conference on Wednesday: “If the government is closed, it would be because Democrats in Congress have rejected food solutions to finance the government and instead in their remote left base,” Johnson said at a press conference on Wednesday. “If the Democrats are ready to work with us and think responsibility for how we spend less than we did last year, we are all open to that.”

Since negotiations on Stopgap financing, Republicans press the progress of regular financing bills in the progress offer in determining new spending levels.

In front of the Congress until the end of the fiscal year on September 30 to pass legislation to keep the government funded, and some Republicans are concerned that the possibility of closure is increasing in light of the increasing partisan tensions.

Democrats in the House of Representatives voted in March in Luxeke against a procedure in the entire year, but the majority leader of the Senate Chuck Schumer (DN.Y) angered the democratic base by agreeing to the procedure made from the Republican Party and not forcing the government.

Harris expressed his support for another game of chicken with Democrats in the Senate.

“Republicans have proven that they are able to pass CR, and to look, if Chuck Schumer wants to vote against spending that he voted in favor of twice … he can explain this to the American people.”

But there is a momentum from the two parties in both rooms to confront some annual credits bills in 2026 to correct short -term government financing.

Cole told reporters on Wednesday that financing negotiations “talking about relatively modest bills” as possible additions to the upcoming Stopgap plan. This includes the entire year financing bills for old warriors affairs, agriculture and legislative branch.

Democrats, who were angry at the Trump administration’s movements to finance external aid programs without the approval of Congress, remain a wild card in negotiations. But some indicate support for the efforts of the two parties to pay through several financial financing bills 2026 before the end of the month.

Senator Patty Murray (Washington), a better democratic for the Senate Credit Committee, has expressed his support for the transfer of the three laws as well as correcting short -term financing.

“As part of the two parties, CR in the short term, I support the presentation of these three bills and pass them with CR in the short term of the remaining nine remains,” Murray said at a press conference on Wednesday. “I hope we can continue to make progress in our advanced projects in the Senate so that they are ready at the end of the month.”

In a statement on Wednesday, a White House official said that the administration “is working with Congress leaders to continue to fund the government responsibly.”

The statement said: “CR is increasing in September of the possibility, given the amount of time to evaluate Congress before the end of the current financing law, and talks continue to its length.” “Democratic threats to close the government because of foreign aid are not in the interest of the American people or an organized financing process.”

But Johnson also faces pressure from the right wing of the Republican Party Conference for a long -term stop.

Freedom Caucus member, MP R-Texas, said he wants to see another continuous decision for a year, with “anomalies or two” to control spending in major priority areas such as defensive spending.

“Maybe not” he does not vote in order to stop in the short term-and support for a long-term continuous decision that will depend on the type of “abnormal cases” in legislation.

“If they would put a set of allocations there, there is no way I will support it,” Portles said.

However, this financing enhances projects and initiatives in the regions of the members, renamed from allocations to community financing projects, is a priority for other Republicans in a continuous decision.

Many Republicans have already been frustrated due to the lack of funding for projects that belong to the homeland in light of the current stoppage that the government has been working on since March.