CDC vaccine vote is subject to auditing: Five fast food

A major federal advisory committee was spent by Minister of Health Robert F. Kennedy Junior is two chaotic days in discussing possible significant changes in centers of control and prevention control centers, but she left the most controversial recommendation for another period.

On Thursday, the Consultative Committee for Iris -Evidence (ACIP) voted not to recommend the joint measles, mumps, German measles and varicose veins (MMRV) for any patient under the age of 4 years, which reflects the current guidance.

After a long discussion and sometimes controversial and controversial, the committee refused to vote to change the hepatitis B vaccine for the new iron.

The committee unanimously adopted a more restricted recommendation for Covid-19, although the practical effects are not yet clear.

The committee’s recommendations bear huge importance. Most private insurance companies are required to cover the ACIP shots, and many state policies on vaccines are linked to the committee’s guidance.

Here are the main meals.

Childhood vaccine schedule changes 

The committee, chosen by Kennedy after the previous plate refused in June, its first liberation of the childhood vaccine schedule on Thursday.

The committee voted 8-3 to recommend delaying the use of compact measles, mumps, measles, and a small vaccine. The snapshot is given for about 15 percent of children across the country. It carries a slightly high risk of fever attacks.

Instead of the joint snapshot, the painting recommended two separate voices; One against measurement, German mumps and measles (MMR) and another for waterflower.

Despite the relatively low absorption of the joint snapshot, members of communication from professional medical groups repeatedly indicated that there is no new evidence to justify the change and urge the committee not to act.

ACIP Cody Misserr, Professor of Pediatrics at Gizel College of Medicine in Dartmouth, voted against change. He said that fever attacks occur at 3 to 5 percent of all children, and while frightening, they are not associated with any kind of weakness. He also said that the recommendation removes parental selection.

MMRV vote is likely to be the last change in childhood vaccines, as the committee creates a working group on childhood and adolescents.

Do not vote for hepatitis B  

The biggest surprise came when the committee decided to delay voting on the changes in the table of hepatitis B vaccine. The committee members said that they did not feel prepared to vote and were confused by the presentations and the language of recommendation.

The vote was initially determined on Thursday, but it was postponed on Friday at the last minute due to the formulation of the formulation in the voting language. But on Friday morning, the members voted to apply the procedure indefinitely.

The committee members still have questions about the safety of the shot, while others did not want to rush forward and make a change without a good reason.

“I think there is enough ambiguity here and the remaining discussion enough about safety, effectiveness and timing that I think is the time to be premature,” said Robert Malon, a member of the committee.

“We are more wise when we are careful,” said Joseph Hiblin, a psychiatrist and neuroscientist at the National Institutes of Health.

This step was applauded by infectious disease experts, as well as Senator Bill Casidi (R-La). Cassidy has highlighted the warning in recent weeks about the possibility of serious damage if a 34 -year -old policy was declined to vaccinate all newborn B. against hepatitis B at birth.

“President Trump and I agree: the vaccines save lives. If my mother wants to get a hepatitis vaccine to save life to protect the new baby, then she must be able to obtain it,” Cassidy said in a statement. “The suggested Acip recommendation can show this access to a risk, which makes it difficult for that mother or that parent to protect her child from hepatitis B. The postponement was the correct invitation.”

Lack of experience and confusion is a two 

The decision to delay the vote indefinitely was just a sign of the lack of committee’s experience and the wide confusion about the voting process. About half of the committee members were appointed to the committee earlier this week.

Separate on Friday, the committee decided to retain the re -vote on whether the measles vaccine, the mumps, the measles and the dollar (MMRV) should be covered in the children’s vaccine program (VFC), which provides low -cost or free vaccines for about half of the children in the country who are not insured or on medicaid.

The committee voted at the beginning in favor of, but the drafting of the question confuses some members, who asked what they were voting for them. One person refrained from voting, pointing to confusion.

So Friday, they reclassified them and reflected the decision of the previous day.

Covid’s uncertainty 

The committee’s vote on Friday added more uncertainty about who can get Covid-19 vaccines, and how.

The committee unanimously recommended people with their doctor about obtaining a Covid-19 snapshot. The vaccination did not recommend, but they also did not recommend it.

The vote is a departure from the current global recommendation, but it is not clear what will be the practical impact. The decision, if it is signed by federal health leaders, is likely to maintain the release insurance coverage.

It can also create complications for Americans who want to have a vaccination in a pharmacy without a prescription, depending on their condition.

CDC data provided on Friday found about two -thirds of adults who received Covid’s shot last year in a pharmacy.

The reactions were mixed.

For example, Aarp criticized the transition from a global recommendation.

“If you want to get a vaccine, you should be able to get one. Aarp is interested in the decision of the Consultative Committee of the Center for Disease Control, which may make it difficult for the older Americans to reach the Covid-19 vaccines that have been proven to protect their health,” the group said in a statement.

And so did the Senator Patti Murray (D-WASH).

Murray said: “This ACIP committee’s decision – which has been closely formed with skeptics of unqualified vaccines – said to reduce access to Covid vaccines is very annoying and not based in science,” Murray said. “ACIP members who chose RFK JR. said this is about” individual decisions to make, “but their vote today means that many Americans who want a Covid vaccine may not be able to get it.

“The committee was encouraged to recommend Covid vaccines.”

More upcoming changes 

In what was likely to have a sign of the upcoming changes, Covid’s discussion on Friday included unrestricted presentations that strengthened the famous anti -vaccine conversation points, including allegations that vaccines are contaminated, and can cause defects in cancer and childbirth.

Hundreds of millions of people in the United States have received Covid-19 vaccines, and they received billions around the world. There is no evidence of those assurances.

But the main food and drug Administration Advisers did not deny Tircy Beth Hug any of the claims, and he only said that the agency takes public safety seriously.

Fayzer official told the committee that the study on birth defects and found them during the first third of pregnancy, and women in the study received the vaccine later on pregnancy.

Vacumen, who are usually allowed to provide data during ACIP meetings, limited a few minutes to a brief phone call. Pfizer took enough time to say that a hateful had saved between five and seven thousand lives last year.

RTSEF Levi, a member of the ACIP team, who leads the Coronverus Virus vaccine, has made a presentation accusing CDC of not communicating effectively to the risk of vaccine.

Levy is a well -known critic of the Mercy Rana vaccines, and has called for removing them from the market before.