How many times can the Supreme Court turn its head?
In the Supreme Court, which is close to the fast October State, he agreed to hear the appeal in three main cases related to some of the most important strength of President Trump.
One addresses his efforts to control the independent federal reserve system. The second seeks to turn the comprehensive and destructive definitions that he forced to the Americans. The third challenges its arbitrary plan to ignore both the constitution and the authority in Congress by refusing to spend the authorized foreign aid funds and allocated by Congress.
Before Trump’s second state, the court has repeatedly formed the law to save it from the legal and political danger. Since his second term began, he did the same thing to protect it, and his actions that the law cannot, and its devastating policies.
The question of life or death that is now commenting on our constitutional republic is, to reformulate the formulation of Bob Dylan, and the number of times the court can revolve its head and pretend that it does not see. What Trump is doing is clear and starkly unconstitutional. Its individual violations seem countless, but all that they have one common thing: they are coherent parts of his design effort to topple our republican formed from the government and turning American democracy into Americans of tyranny.
Trump confirmed the unconstitutional powers to intimidate his opponents and confirm control of every important field of American life. He won the neutral Congress and practiced its tax power by imposing an illegal tariff, and seized the functions of national cultural institutions and distorted their jobs, and the major law firms and prestigious universities toured submission. He overcame the largest companies in the country and put pressure on some parts of their assets to his government. He partially disrupted and partially destroyed the science -based health care system and began to use federal authority and federal agencies to enhance his distorted and self -view of the nation’s history and culture.
Moreover, the values of the first modification exceeded, and pressed the TV networks to get rid of the comedians who mocked him while forcing them at the same time to make what appears to be blackmail to ensure his management approval of the proposed institutional integration.
It also spoiled every government institution on hand. It has moved the Ministry of Justice and the Federal Investigation Office to tools of personal revenge and harassment against political critics, and the army to a local police force designed to intimidate and suppress cities and democratic countries.
Civil service employees have launched protected personnel because he considered them unwanted personally. He has repeatedly targeted others who oppose him by inspiring fully unfounded prosecutions. Finally, the restrictions of conflict of interests ignored the presidency to a tool subject to self -service to achieve huge economic gains for himself and his family.
Before Trump returned to the presidency, the court was systematically late and defeated the cases in which public prosecutors committed criminal procedures against him and where civil liters brought claims that threatened his campaign to re -election. Most of them are somewhat terrible, as he has spoken the law and legal sources of granting on Trump, a special presidential immunity against criminal judicial prosecutions-a decision that cannot reflect the basic principles of American founders, the purpose of the constitution and its structure, or any historical concept of the true original meaning of the document.
This decision was currently standing, such as Dred Scott and Plessy V. Ferguson, as a memorial to a court apparently ready to be proficient for partisan purposes instead of defending the constitution and its principles.
After Trump returned to the presidency, the court continued to support his wide pies to power by pouring federal law to allow him to launch wide ranges of federal officials and thus control most of the independent federal agencies if not all. Moreover, by exploiting the so -called “Dadow Dockket”, it has repeatedly reflected the lower federal courts that stopped many of the most worse trends in Trump. On the one hand, in protecting Trump from the lower courts, he usually did this without providing any reason until he tried to explain or justify his decisions.
With the three cases, the court will hear this term – and other similar challenges that must be followed – the court will determine the fate of our republic. Will the “original” court, which has been self -declared to convert our constitutional republic into authoritarian, unilateral bluetia, dominated by worship? Or will it finally get to know the deadly danger and its management that our constitutional republic puts and works as it should? The answer is not “blowin” in the wind “, but it grows in the minds, hearts and value of the court.
We can only pray so that the court does not continue to turn her head and pretend that she does not see.
Edward a. Porsil, Son, Joseph Solomon, Fakhri Professor at the College of Law in New York, author of “Antonin Skalia and US Constitutional: The historical importance of a judicial symbol”.
