No, Trump cannot legally federate US elections


With Trump President Donald Trump also attacks the government and the US constitution letter on various fronts in his plans to manage US elections.

Nearly a decade after federal and state investment in the security and integrity of election, researchers and election officials working across the country have been found that US electoral infrastructure is as strong as the past. However, in an executive guideline and subsequent statements on social media, Trump has promoted a baseless rape that the US electoral infrastructure is obsolete and unreliable and requires federal intervention.

The Trump administration has also restricted a significant portion of the federal government’s security work and has installed officials in the Home Department of Security, denying the credibility of the Trump presidency in 2020. Recently, Hadr Hani, the promoter of the conspiracy theory of the election conspiracy, was appointed Deputy Foreign Minister for the integrity of the US Department of Security in late August.

“Remember, the states are merely” representing “the federal government in counting and tabulating the votes,” Trump wrote last month. “They have to do what the federal government, as the US president shows.”

Non -party election experts emphasize that this is a completely inaccurate and misleading interpretation of the US Constitution and the pattern of decentralized and government -controlled elections.

“From the very beginning, it is true in the constitution that in Article 1, governments determine the time, place and the way of elections. States hold elections; Congress can add laws, “Trump makes all the statements that he ends a vote, which cannot be trusted by voting machines, but he can’t do it. He certainly has a bullying pulpit that misleads and confuses people and intimidate power.”

Pamela Smith, the head of the verified, non -profit voting that increases the integrity of the election system, emphasizes that it is very difficult to open and separate concerns that the government is inappropriate to use as a means of trying to determine the conditions of the election. “It’s really difficult to talk about all these,” Smith says. “It is not the White House’s task to tell the Election Aid Commission,” You have to change how to issue a certificate of voting and decision -making. “

Ben Adida, executive director of nonprofit open source voting equipment, voting, pointing out that encouraging state and local authorities to prioritize the replacement of old voting machines, so they are in line with the best current standards and standards. He says it was a “positive transformation” of March’s executive order, though he also points out that “the proposed time is very tight to be realistic.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *