The researchers are the American boycotters with the worst violations of drinking water

A new study found that the American provinces that have the most terrible water quality violations are concentrated in four states: Western Virginia, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Akllahoma.

Among the 10 best regions of these areas were Wyoming Province, W. Virginia, who has boasted the benefit of public water with the largest number of violations in one water system, according to the study, which was published on Tuesday in analyzing the international risk of the magazine.

About 2 million people worldwide – the equivalent of the entire population of Nebraska – have no ongoing water, and this deficiency in basic drinking water services tends to occur in groups, according to the authors of the study.

They wrote: “This high number is not distributed evenly or is relatively distributed through the population.”

With the presence of 30 million people who depend on drinking water systems that violate safety rules, the researchers sought to identify the types of systems most vulnerable to these palaces.

Many experts suggested the privatization of water – transferring public water systems to ownership or management of private companies – as a possible solution to make us more clean and safer.

However, at the same time, the authors have explained, the opponents have argued that such a switch could give companies priority to profits on public needs.

Therefore, the researchers decided to investigate how to implement the operations of the private system against public system on water quality and access to them.

To do this, they set the country’s distribution to the ownership of the regime, violations, water injustice and water access perceptions between the population.

Among the violations included in the research, the failure to adhere to the regulations under the safe drinking water law, such as excesses of extreme pollutants, lack of compliance with the required water treatment protocols and the absence of monitoring schedules or communication with customers.

“Our results indicate that privatization alone is not a solution,” said lead author Alex Sigri Cohen, an assistant professor of science and risk at Oregon University.

“The local context, such as organizational enforcement, societal weakness, and society’s priorities, are important in determining the results,” Sijri Cohen added.

The provinces that showed the issues of water injustice in Mississippi-the home of eight out of 10 of the 10 best sites-in addition to the southern Dakota and Texas, according to the study.

The researchers defined the injustice of the water as “unequal access to safe and clean drinking water that are not proportional to low -income families and colored people.” Thus, they formulated a degree at the boycott level based on a set of water system and social weakness.

The authors concluded that the hot points in the injustice of the water were often in areas with low special system ownership and the presence of the strongest public order – which indicates that public systems are not necessarily superior to reducing violations.

The data also showed that residency in a province increased the injustice of water and increased a higher percentage of the privatized systems was linked to a stronger perception of weakening about access to water and security.

To move forward, the authors expressed their hope that legislators and organizers are able to benefit from research to inform their water management strategies and narrow their focus.

“Politics makers can use the results we have reached to determine efforts in the field of enforcement and determine their priorities in hot points, and to make improvements in infrastructure and implement policies that guarantee drinking water at reasonable and safe prices – especially for socially vulnerable societies.”